ConstructionPro Week, Volume: 6 - Issue: 15 - 04/14/2017

Those Controversial Subcontractor Indemnification Clauses

By Bruce Jervis

 

General or prime contractors have always been enamored with indemnification clauses. Place one in every subcontract and if there is any injury on the project the subs will ultimately be liable. The prime contractor will be exonerated even if it shared responsibility for a safety hazard.


The inequity of this arrangement, imposed by prime contractors with superior economic leverage, has attracted the attention of state legislatures and appellate courts. In many jurisdictions, indemnification against one’s own negligence is unenforceable. But this leads to a question. Is the indemnification clause entirely unenforceable or can the contractor still enforce the clause to the extent the injury loss was caused by others?


A California court recently addressed this question. It concluded that an anti-indemnification statute, tracked by the language of the subcontract clause itself, intended to create a system of comparative fault. The prime contractor could not be indemnified by the subcontractor to the extent the injury loss was caused by the prime’s own negligence. But, the prime was entitled to indemnification to the extent the loss was caused by the subcontractor or others.


One’s opinion of subcontract indemnification clauses generally depends on whether one is the indemnitee (prime or general contractor) or the indemnitor (subcontractor). Objectively, however, there are issues of fairness and public policy. There is also the principle of freedom to contractually allocate risk. Your comments are welcomed.

 

COMMENTS

GROSS NEGLIGENCE on the part of the contractor will never exonerate it from resultant liability irrespective of clause(s) intended at doing so, provided that gross negligence can be proofed.I am however of the view that parties should should work together and realize that an injury and/or an incident on the project is undesirable to all and will impact negatively in one way or the other on all,as such, parties should work together to prevent such risks. No party, in these set of facts, contractor will get away with gross negligence as this can not be priced by the sub-contractor and a competent DAB/Court will take that into consideration in making a ruling.
Posted by: Paballo Motsamai - Friday, April 14, 2017 11:00 AM










WPL
PUBLISHING CO, INC.
WPL Publishing - 5750 Bou Avenue #1712 - Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: (301)765-9525  -  Fax: (301)983-4367

All Content and Design Copyright © 2017 WPL Publishing
About Us

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

My Account