VOLUME Construction Advisor Today   ISSUE 93   FEBRUARY 04, 2011


Contractor licensing schemes pose a dilemma. Construction contracts are entered into by corporations, limited liability companies and other forms of business associations. But corporations don’t go to school, sit for exams or obtain licenses. That is a role for individuals. And it is the licensed individual, not the corporation, which pulls the building permit and is responsible for supervising the construction. Owners necessarily rely on the diligence and expertise of the licensed individual. But if something goes wrong, do owners have recourse against that individual? Not necessarily.


In Florida recently, a contractor’s licensed “qualifying agent” was sued individually for negligently allowing work which did not comply with the building code. The corporate general contractor had simply failed to appear in response to the suit. And the individual agent escaped without liability. The court expressed frustration that individuals could lend their name and license to corporations which can disappear as soon as there is a claim, leaving owners without recourse. But the court said it was bound by state statute and a ruling by the state’s highest court.


Is this fair to project owners? Many states prohibit design professionals such as architects and engineers from using corporate entities as a shield against personal liability for professional negligence. Shouldn’t the same rule apply to licensed individuals acting on behalf of corporate contractors? I welcome your comments.


Featured in Next Week’s Construction Claims Advisor:

  • Expert Testimony Not Required to Establish Termination Damages
  • Virginia High Court Distinguishes “Equipment” from “Materials”
  • Contractor Recovers Mistaken Overpayments from Disadvantaged Sub


Results from a recent Alliance for Environmental Sustainability (AES) research project suggest that Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)-certified homes are substantially more energy efficient than their traditional counterparts.


AECOM Technology Corp., a provider of technical and management support services for government and commercial clients, has expanded its global use of building information modeling (BIM) solutions with its design of the $US60-million Roseisle Distillery, which is believed to be Scotland’s largest malt whisky distillery.


For the design, AECOM used structure-, architecture- and production-combined BIM to assist with the design of the facility. AECOM provided all non-process consultancy services for the distillery, which was certified as “Excellent” under the Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method.





WPL Publishing - 5750 Bou Avenue #1712 - Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: (301)765-9525  -  Fax: (301)983-4367

All Content and Design Copyright © 2017 WPL Publishing
About Us

Contact Us

Privacy Policy

My Account